Why is consequentialism a good way to evaluate morality? And which philosophers best support consequentialism? - best support for testcles
I write a case for discussion, and I am totally overwhelmed. I want to use consequentialism to support a moral value and is a huge topic that I do not know where to start looking for evidence of.
If you have little time, just a short list of his favorite philosophers consequentialism that the moral permissibility + is his best writing on the subject would help enormously. Thank you!
Monday, February 22, 2010
Best Support For Testcles Why Is Consequentialism A Good Way To Evaluate Morality? And Which Philosophers Best Support Consequentialism?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comments:
The utilitarian consequentialist ethics is so great. Look Bentham, Mill, are the most important. In advocating a consequentialist moral philosophy, one can say how they use it already! It seems that in most cases, the consequences of an action that counts. It explains very well the character.
Why do we think murder is wrong? Since the overall consequences are often bad. The same thing with a few examples.
If someone says that sometimes bring the ends do not justify the means, it to extremes. How ...
Opponents: Torture is always wrong, no matter what!
You: Well, if the only way to prevent someone from destroying the world and kill all of them is torture, it would be morally reprehensible?
With respect to sources, John Stuart Mill's "utilitarianism "is good, as well as the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (link below).
Post a Comment